Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 448 of 2,288    |
|    Larry Edelstein to Peter    |
|    Re: Company thought DB2 will be better t    |
|    20 Sep 03 12:41:00    |
      XPost: comp.databases.informix, comp.databases.ibm-db2, ibm.soft       are.websphere.application-server       From: lsedels@us.ibm.com              Peter ... I have worked with many customers for more than two years who have       never experienced this problem.              You are still not providing any specifics or details on this. What are you       afraid of? At this point, I must       assume that this never happened. I'm sorry. It doesn't take much to provide       evidence.              Larry Edelstein              Peter wrote:              > Hi Larry!       >       > Regarding your comment on continue to trash DB2, I wish you should not       > take it in negative way. I find same problem in DB2 as in OS/2.       >       > I have worked on OS/2 and technically it is far superior than Microsoft       > Windows. It did have same issue of all of sudden crashed problem that was       > resolved in few years. Unfortunately MS already had the market before that.       >       > If you find my info is incorrect, I am just asking you to work on one       > install of DB2 for 2 years. You will see instance disappearance and when       > you type db2start; it starts as if nothing has happened. It simply forgets       > and forgives it. I have never seen database starting like that and forgetting       > why it crashed all of sudden in production. It is good and bad both. As       > a DBA you have to start instance again only and blame poor developers       > for wrong SQL statements. Poor guy only did select on a table with       > a simple where clause. I have been asked to give query details; there is       > nothing in the query other than select on one table with one condition       > on where clause. Simply blame the DB2 developers as a workaround.       >       > Peter       >       > "Neil Truby" |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca