Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 618 of 2,288    |
|    Frank to Daniel Roy    |
|    Re: count (1) and count (*)    |
|    31 Oct 03 09:30:03    |
      From: fvanbortel@netscape.net              Daniel Roy wrote:       > I read somewhere (asktom?) that "select count(1) from table" is       > internally rewritten as "select count(*) from (select 1 from table)",       > and therefore just adds some overhead.       >       > Daniel       >       > gelangov@hotmail.com (Geetha) wrote in message news:<4b40e20a.       310290724.13e86079@posting.google.com>...       >       >>I searched in the Oracle documents what count (1) meant and I could       >>not find an answer. Can some one explain what Oracle does internally       >>when use count (1) VS count (*). Thank you very much in advance! We       >>use Oracle 9i.              NO!       Actually Tom wrote:       "Prove it, give me that test case. You are wrong.       COUNT(*) and COUNT(1) are the *same* -- the same -- the same -- no       different, the same.       count(1) is internally optimized to count(*) "              And he posted the explain plans for count(*) and count(1).              --       Regards, Frank van Bortel              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca