Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.oracle    |    Overblown overpriced overengineered SHIT    |    2,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 632 of 2,288    |
|    Michael Peppler to All    |
|    Re: Choosing DBMS and architecture for e    |
|    03 Nov 03 07:33:07    |
      XPost: comp.databases, comp.databases.sybase, comp.databases.ms-sqlserver       From: mpeppler@peppler.org              On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 07:08:07 -0800, Alex_Bxl wrote:              > I'm wondering how to design that part, should I store all information       > on the web host only ? miror that DB every evening on some local DB       > server to be able to use the data without eating up lots of bandwith ?       > separate the database in 2 parts ? how to sync and assure integrity       > then ? having a local DB will also mean the company will have to pay a       > licence for the DBMS ...              I'd use Sybase, and I'd use replication server to move data from the       production server (in co-location facility) to the reporting server (in       the office).              But you can do similar things with Oracle, MS-SQL, etc., although I'd       personally stay away from MS-SQL due to its being Microsoft-centric (i.e.       can't scale beyond Intel/Windows type machines)              Michael       --       Michael Peppler Data Migrations, Inc.       mpeppler@peppler.org http://www.mbay.net/~mpeppler       Sybase T-SQL/OpenClient/OpenServer/C/Perl developer available for short or       long term contract positions - http://www.mbay.net/~mpeppler/resume.html              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca