From: EgbertBabst@BabstSoft.com   
      
   Liz,   
   OK, I didn't recognize the need to compare values by bouncing forward or   
   back to succeeding records or so.   
   If so, no doubt, setRange would be best.   
   With or without scan depends...   
   I still admire Paradox for all the different ways to reach a goal.   
   May be you're right as he already is in a scan loop...   
   -))   
      
   Egbert   
      
   "Liz McGuire"  schrieb im Newsbeitrag   
   news:45d89914@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...   
   > That would make it slightly harder to do what he wants as he needs to go   
   > to record #1, read a value, then inside the loop, go to record #2 and   
   > compare it to record #1, then repeat for every pair of records (or   
   > something like that).  This kind of thing is easier in a loop where you   
   > control the record movement rather than the loop controlling it.   
   >   
   > Given what Anders had to say, I'm guessing a secondary index and setRange   
   > would simplify life greatly.   
   >   
   > FWIW,   
   >   
   > Liz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)