Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.paradox    |    To crash or not to crash, asks Borland    |    9,834 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,860 of 9,834    |
|    Anders Jonsson to All    |
|    Re: Query directly from secondary index    |
|    18 Oct 07 19:05:42    |
      From: gt3TakeThisAway@bredband.net              > Imagine a 100MB file on network server. With a 500k index file.              Which is ofcourse very different from a 650kb with 50 k index file. The real       difference on small files is almost impossible to see.              >       > A query draws the entire table local, and THEN processes the query       >       > Which file would you prefer to bring local for the query to act on?       >              Thanks for the clarification, I wasn't sure that it brought ALL columns       over, even the one that is not included in the query. How about a tcursor       then? Will a scan of all records eventually bring the enterie table over the       network, even the columns that is not refered to by the tcursor?                     Anders              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca