Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.paradox    |    To crash or not to crash, asks Borland    |    9,834 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,016 of 9,834    |
|    Jim Moseley to All    |
|    GPV in report designer, data model    |
|    29 Jan 08 23:23:02    |
      From: jmose@mapson.attglobal.net              I had a tricky bug I just spent hours on, and was wondering if anyone could       explain it, or if they've run into it. I'm using Pdox 9 sp3.              An existing report had a data model of:       Child table - primary key: RecID, Date1, Time1, Seq1       Master table - primary key: RecID; (with fields Company1 & Emp1)       Company table - primary key: Company1       Employee table - primary key: Emp1              My data model used the Child table as the main table, with a 1-1 link to       Master. Master had a 1-1 link to both Company & Employee. This has worked       fine for the year or so since the report was created.              I wanted to add a new table, that looked a lot like the Child table:       Child2 table - primary key: RecID, Date1, Time1, Seq1              I tried to add this to the data model, with Child having a 1-1 link to Child2       (by including all 4 key fields). When I ran the report, without even adding       any of the fields from Child2, I got a GPV immediately.              If I dropped Seq1 from the link, it ran fine.              After much experimenting, I removed Child2 from my data model. Then I unlinked       Child from Master. I added back Child2 & relinked it with all 4 fields.        Then, I relinked Child to Master. This seems to have fixed it.              Can anyone explain why the sequence of how the tables are linked matters?        Is it because of the length of the linked keys? Is there a rule to be       followed?                     Thanks,       Jim Moseley              ps. To further confuse me, I got a GPV when I tried to unlink Master from       Child, while Child2 was still linked. I had to unlink Child2 first, then       Master, then add back Child2, then add back Master. Very strange.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca