Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.paradox    |    To crash or not to crash, asks Borland    |    9,834 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,076 of 9,834    |
|    Anders Jonsson to All    |
|    Re: Same form, but one system GPFs...?    |
|    21 Feb 08 08:09:21    |
      From: gt3TakeThisAway@bredband.net              > Using the 'c' functions in a network environment is known to *potentially*       > cause issues.              The "only" problem with cMax that I know is that it requires a full lock       which of course could be problematic on a shared table. However, I have       never heard that it has cause a GPF and using it against a table in PRIV       that is not being edited shouldn't be a problem. At least that is how I have       understod the issue.              >       > Using other than a '100%' ZOOM factor is known to *potentially* cause       > issues.              Agree.                     > Accept that it is fixed on that system (if it is), and that the others       > didn't need to be 'fixed'.              Well as this is a discussion forum and the traffic isn't exactly heavy I       find it interesting to discuss a problem and find a plausible solution. IMHO       the zoom factor or the path to PRIV is much more likely cause of GPF than       the use of cMax.              But you are right, if it's working now, why bother.              Anders              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca