From: dominickdimantova@comcast.net   
      
   Thank you Michelle! I appreciate you defending me against these idiots, like   
   Jim or Steve and a few others, who think I'm trying to cheat. This Leslie   
   character didn't help either, as she/he didn't understand what my original   
   intention was, when I first posted my question here. If we can get rid of   
   the morons here (most of you all gave me helpful advice and I thank you for   
   it), who have nothing better to do than to accuse someone of lying, cheating,   
   than these discussion groups would be a really great thing to come to for   
   answers to questions.   
      
      
      
      
   Michelle Burnore  wrote:   
   >   
   >Based on Dominick's original post, I understood it as:   
   >   
   >A.  Client has Paradox data   
   >B.  Client wants to convert that data to Access but doesn't know how   
   >C.  No mention was made regarding full OPal systems conversions, so I   
   >didn't leap to that conclusion.   
   >D.  The Client is looking to Dominick, not for Paradox experience but   
   >for his expertise in Access   
   >E.  His questions were simple and basic.   
   >   
   >Having said that, I responded in like.  Here are the field types, here   
   >are the common files, etc.  If he wants more specifics, than he will ask.   
   >   
   >I thought it was very quick for some to assume he was a cheat and a   
   >liar, instead of someone thinking ahead to try and meet a client's   
   >needs.  I've tried not to comment on that part of the thread, as it is   
   >neither productive nor helpful.  Can we not escalate this any further?   
   >   
   >Michelle   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)