Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.databases.paradox    |    To crash or not to crash, asks Borland    |    9,834 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,360 of 9,834    |
|    Leslie Milburn to Michelle Burnore    |
|    Re: Overview of Paradox database structu    |
|    02 Aug 08 11:52:35    |
      From: CDB4W@NOSPAM.bigpond.com              "Michelle Burnore" wrote:       >       > Initially, I had the same reaction as you.....Paradox system - OPal,       > Forms - Data Models - Reports - Data structures that ALL are dependent on,       > being converted to a "like" system in Access....big project. Even if you       > are experienced in both, it's a project. But then when his further posts       > were asking for basic database structure, I thought, well maybe we are       > over-complicating this, and he just needs to know if Paradox tables have       > compatible field types to Access, so when doing a simple import, there       > would be no surprises. I know that importing a Paradox table to Access is       > a no-brainer in most cases, but what if the Paradox table has a field type       > that Access can't cope with? I was looking at his questions in that vein.              Hi Michelle,              In general I agree with you but the question was in the context of a job       application and that makes a difference in my book. He even admitted that he       wanted to increase his chances of getting the job using the information       provided. I have a problem with this and see right through it, as others do.       Ther is nothing more to say.              Leslie.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca