From: michelljb@aol.com   
      
   I respect your opinion.  Again, I like to give people the benefit of the   
   doubt so I didn't take it that way.  Perhaps he worded his initial post   
   wrong.  In my mind, it would take a really ballsy person to take on a   
   job they knew they would fail at, but again, I can only speak for me.   
      
   Thank you Leslie.   
      
   :) Michelle   
      
      
      
   Leslie Milburn wrote:   
   > "Michelle Burnore" wrote:   
   >> Initially, I had the same reaction as you.....Paradox system - OPal,   
   >> Forms - Data Models - Reports - Data structures that ALL are dependent on,   
   >> being converted to a "like" system in Access....big project.  Even if you   
   >> are experienced in both, it's a project.  But then when his further posts   
   >> were asking for basic database structure, I thought, well maybe we are   
   >> over-complicating this, and he just needs to know if Paradox tables have   
   >> compatible field types to Access, so when doing a simple import, there   
   >> would be no surprises.  I know that importing a Paradox table to Access is   
   >> a no-brainer in most cases, but what if the Paradox table has a field type   
   >> that Access can't cope with?  I was looking at his questions in that vein.   
   >   
   > Hi Michelle,   
   >   
   > In general I agree with you but the question was in the context of a job   
   > application and that makes a difference in my book. He even admitted that he   
   > wanted to increase his chances of getting the job using the information   
   > provided. I have a problem with this and see right through it, as others do.   
   > Ther is nothing more to say.   
   >   
   > Leslie.   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)