Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.telecom    |    Telecommunications digest. (Moderated)    |    17,262 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,369 of 17,262    |
|    Jeffrey Walton to All    |
|    [telecom] Judge Rejects Due Process Argu    |
|    07 Sep 20 01:58:27    |
      fcd4211f       From: noloader@gmail.com              A federal judge in Oregon recently found that a $925 million award in       a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class action did not       violate due process. The marketing company argued that the aggregate       amount was disproportionate to the harm suffered by the plaintiffs.       However, the judge rejected the company's argument, finding that the       $500 penalty amount for a single statutory violation was       constitutional.              The lead plaintiff sued the company after the company had called her       four times without her consent. Following a three-day jury trial,       where the company did not present any evidence or witnesses, the jury       found that the company had made 1,850,440 telemarketing calls to the       plaintiffs. The minimum statutory penalty under the TCPA was $500,       which brought the aggregate statutory damages to $925,220,000. The       company challenged the aggregate award, arguing that it was       unconstitutionally excessive...              The case is Lori Wakefield v. ViSalus, Inc., No. 3:15-cv-1857-SI, (D.       Or. August 14, 2020)              https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/judge-rejects-due-process-argu       ents-and-44764/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca