Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.telecom    |    Telecommunications digest. (Moderated)    |    17,262 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,386 of 17,262    |
|    Jeffrey Walton to All    |
|    [telecom] Government Advocates for Stric    |
|    12 Sep 20 01:43:07    |
      ce1e1be1       From: noloader@gmail.com              The Acting Solicitor General submitted an amicus brief in Facebook v.       Duguid on September 4, urging the Supreme Court to find that telephony       must randomly or sequentially generate telephone numbers, then dial       those numbers in order to qualify as an automatic telephone dialing       system (ATDS) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).              In July, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Facebook v. DuGuid to       decide, once and for all, whether an ATDS requires random or       sequential number generation. In its late 2018 Marks decision, the       Ninth Circuit found that storage of telephone numbers, without random       or sequential number generation, was enough to satisfy the first prong       of the TCPA's definition of an ATDS. Earlier this year, the Second       Circuit joined the Ninth Circuit, while the Third, Seventh, and       Eleventh Circuits have concluded that a system must have the capacity       to generate random or sequential numbers to qualify as an ATDS.              In Duguid, Facebook challenged the Ninth Circuit's definition,       contending that it was too broad. In defending the lawsuit, Facebook       argued that its equipment was not an ATDS because it stores numbers       only to be called "reflexively" in response to "outside stimuli," such       as a suspicious log-in. Facebook's equipment, it argued, does not "use       a random or sequential number generator," and as a result, does not       constitute an ATDS. According to Facebook, if the definition of ATDS       is not read to exclude equipment which only stores numbers for       "responsive" calling, all smartphones will be considered autodialers.       The Ninth Circuit disagreed, doubled-down on Marks, and ruled that the       plaintiff's claims could go forward....              https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=165e5b73-49d0-4c9       -89f2-2f576371a159              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca