Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.telecom    |    Telecommunications digest. (Moderated)    |    17,262 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,410 of 17,262    |
|    Fred Goldstein to Moderator    |
|    Re: [telecom] Strike 3 Saga: Turning Bit    |
|    24 Sep 20 10:32:32    |
      From: invalid@see.sig.telecom-digest.org              On 9/23/2020 3:55 PM, Moderator wrote:       > Appellate Courts Recognize Strike 3's Ability to Meet Standard for Early       > Discovery to Obtain John Doe Defendant's Name and Address       > ...       > ***** Moderator's Note *****       >       > That's not even to mention the Linux binaries that I get via BitTorrent:       > if some preteder-to-the-Linux-throne *COUGH*Redhat*COUGH* decides to       > make an example of someone like me, what then?              Uh, no, Bill. Red Hat, which is now one of the more profitable parts       of IBM, would not attempt anything stupid like that. Linux is all       under the GPL and very much "free as in speech". Red Hat did have a       little proprietary software, but it's not the core of Linux, just       extras they sell (now as IBM).              There was, of course, a case about 15 years ago, wherein The SCO       Group, which had at one point been a minor Linux distributor, decided       to sue IBM and everyone else distributing or using Linux for patent       and copyright infringement. They claimed that they owned Unix, having       bought it from AT&T, and that Linux copied from Unix. It was       preposterous, of course, but people make nutty claims and sometimes       sell shares based on it. The case went on for a few years, eventually       proving that SCO did not own Unix, just had a master license to       distribute it, and that Linux was in any case original. Oh, and the       claim that BSD (Open Source) too had copied from AT&T? That one got       shown to be backwards; Berkeley's work was largely original and AT&T       had taken some code from it.              - -               Fred R. Goldstein k1io fred "at" interisle.net        Interisle Consulting Group        +1 617 795 2701              ***** Moderator's Note *****              RedHat not only attempted, but accomplished, something like that: the       company exploited the open-source movement and managed to convince       corporate America that it owned an operating system called "RedHat       Enterprise Linux," after it relied on hackers like me to popularize       its brand name.              Not only did RedHat prove that the average IT purchasing manager is a       gullible fool, but it got very rich, very quickly, and then its owners       cashed out to IBM and settled in to laughing themselves to sleep every       night, while those of us who had made them their money were relegated       to "Enthusiast" status and told that we would henceforth be allowed       access only to the "Fedora" brand of products, so that we would be       "privileged" to do RedHat's beta testing for them.              When we all finally got to see the man behind the curtain, I ranted       about RedHat's business model and tactics in several posts to the       Boston Linux & Unix User Group's discussion list: FYI, I've included       some of the links here.              http://blu.org/pipermail/discuss/2003-November/017846.html       http://blu.org/pipermail/discuss/2003-November/018051.html                     Bill Horne       Moderator              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca