From: telecomdigestsubmissions@remove-this.telecom-digest.org   
      
   On 1 Dec 2021 21:40:24 -0500   
   John Levine  wrote   
      
   > But that's not what the article says.  WRE is refusing to handle pole   
   attachment   
   > applications, claiming that it's too hard or they're overwhelmed, which is   
   absurd.   
   > If they can put up the poles, they can bleeping well handle attachments to   
   them.   
   >   
   > There also seeems to be an argument about the price, a fairly technical one   
   > about depreciation rates, but Charter is not asking for free access.   
      
   There's more to my concern then just one or two poles in Winslow Arizona.   
      
   The FCC has just published its Repor & Order on the subject, and (IMHO)   
   they make clear that the ordinary folks who paid for the poles by   
   giving up their rights of way are going to get shafted.   
      
   https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-18-111A1.pdf   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)