Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.telecom    |    Telecommunications digest. (Moderated)    |    17,262 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,405 of 17,262    |
|    Grant Taylor to Bill Horne    |
|    Re: [telecom] ISDN's days are numbered:     |
|    23 May 22 10:36:05    |
      From: gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net              On 5/22/22 8:41 PM, Bill Horne wrote:       > When I investigated, I quickly found out that almost all of the       > T-Carrier systems connecting the central office to its Tandems were not       > equipped for "8 bit clean" connections. In other words, the connections       > from the CO to Tandem offices were designed for the original T-Carrier       > "robbed bit" signalling paradigm, and were not capable of delivering       > 64Kbps data connections.              This seems to be directly related to the type of bearer channel /needed/       to support the type of call being placed.              E.g. /data/ was supposed to be 64 kbps / 8-bit clean from TA to TA all       the way through the network. Conversely, /voice/ and / or /audio/ calls       (terms are slightly different) could use 56 kbps or even analog trunks       somewhere in the middle of the network.              My understanding is that 64 kbps / 8-bit clean calls are supposed to       refuse to establish over an impure intermediate transit between two       switches.                            --       Grant. . . .       unix || die              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca