From: wollman@bimajority.org   
      
   In article <20220529192147.GA29678@telecom.csail.mit.edu>,   
   Bill Horne wrote:   
      
   >I'm going to have to descend from whatever foothold I used to have on   
   >Mount Olympus, and admit that I don't understand how you could "nail   
   >up" two bearer channels without disabling the ISDN line's capability   
   >to carry phone calls.   
      
   We did not provide staff members' voice service, only the data   
   connection to our lab.   
      
   When the ISDN service ended, it was convenient for those of us who   
   switched to CLEC ADSL to have that extra known-clean pair to our   
   homes; folks who were trying to run ADSL on top of an existing   
   unbundled ILEC voice circuit had a much harder time with installation   
   and a great deal of finger-pointing between the two carriers.   
      
   (Of course now we all have our Internet connectivity via DOCSIS, and   
   much of this region -- although not Cambridge -- has three competing   
   facilities-based carriers, Comcast, RCN, and Verizon FiOS.)   
      
   -GAWollman   
      
   --   
   Garrett A. Wollman | "Act to avoid constraining the future; if you can,   
   wollman@bimajority.org| act to remove constraint from the future. This is   
   Opinions not shared by| a thing you can do, are able to do, to do together."   
   my employers. | - Graydon Saunders, _A Succession of Bad Days_ (2015)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|