Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.telecom    |    Telecommunications digest. (Moderated)    |    17,262 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,642 of 17,262    |
|    Michael Trew to Bill Horne    |
|    Re: California Passes Law to Protect Chi    |
|    30 Sep 22 16:13:18    |
      From: michael.trew@att.net              On 9/27/2022 22:22, Bill Horne wrote:       > The 18-year age threshold for       > defining a child online is several years higher than the federal       > standard set by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, which       > protects data collected from online users under 13. The bulk of the       > new bill requires online service providers to complete a Data       > Protection Impact Assessment for any online service, product, or       > feature likely to be accessed by children.              The trouble is that children lie about their age for on-line services,       and parents usually don't monitor what they are doing... at least, they       don't monitor them well enough. I have first hand experience; now at 27       years old, I'm well aware of what myself, siblings and peers did on-line       from circa 2005-2012 (10 to 17 years old).              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca