home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.dcom.telecom      Telecommunications digest. (Moderated)      17,262 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 16,642 of 17,262   
   Michael Trew to Bill Horne   
   Re: California Passes Law to Protect Chi   
   30 Sep 22 16:13:18   
   
   From: michael.trew@att.net   
      
   On 9/27/2022 22:22, Bill Horne wrote:   
   > The 18-year age threshold for   
   > defining a child online is several years higher than the federal   
   > standard set by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, which   
   > protects data collected from online users under 13. The bulk of the   
   > new bill requires online service providers to complete a Data   
   > Protection Impact Assessment for any online service, product, or   
   > feature likely to be accessed by children.   
      
   The trouble is that children lie about their age for on-line services,   
   and parents usually don't monitor what they are doing... at least, they   
   don't monitor them well enough.  I have first hand experience; now at 27   
   years old, I'm well aware of what myself, siblings and peers did on-line   
   from circa 2005-2012 (10 to 17 years old).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca