From: malQRMassimilation@gmail.com   
      
   by Joshua Briones , Esteban Morales and Adam B. Korn   
      
   On the heels of Borden v. E-Financial, LLC, 2022 WL 16955661 (9th   
   Cir. Nov. 17, 2022), which we wrote about last month, the Ninth and   
   Eleventh Circuits have continued to keep TCPA lawyers on their toes.   
      
   Recently the Eleventh Circuit, in a per curiam opinion, halted an   
   appeal on the basis of standing to bring automatic telephone dialing   
   system (ATDS) claims. Evans v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 2022 WL   
   17259718 (11th Cir. Nov. 29, 2022). In total, sixteen plaintiffs   
   brought TCPA claims, but the complaint only alleged that eight of the   
   plaintiffs received 27 to 877 calls. For the other eight plaintiffs,   
   the exact number of calls was not specified. The Eleventh Circuit   
   noted, "[f]or any of these plaintiffs, the 'exact number of calls they   
   received could be zero, one, or more than one. Each of these scenarios   
   would potentially present a different resolution to the standing   
   issue." Id. at *1. The Court added that while more "than one call is a   
   concrete injury that confers standing," current case law does not   
   address "whether a single call is sufficient to confer standing." Id.   
      
   https://www.mondaq.com/article/news/1266700?q=1803232&n=656&tp=4&tlk=9&lk=14   
      
   --   
   (Please remove QRM for direct replies)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)