Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.dcom.telecom    |    Telecommunications digest. (Moderated)    |    17,262 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 17,158 of 17,262    |
|    The Telecom Digest to All    |
|    FCC Assures State Lawmakers Of Commitmen    |
|    07 Jun 23 13:40:07    |
      From: digest-replies@telecom-digest.org              by Dave Thomas , Abraham J. Shanedling and Tom Reklaitis              Who knew that state sovereignty and urging states' rights meant       prompting federal agencies to bring about change at the local level?       That seems to be happening in the field of pole attachment regulation.              Section 224 of the Communications Act empowers the FCC to regulate the       rates, terms, and conditions of attachments on poles owned by       investor-owned utilities and phone companies. Section 224, however,       permits states to "reverse preempt" federal authority and regulate       attachments on their own upon filing a certification with the FCC of       their intent to do so. But before taking that step, a state's       legislature typically passes a law that authorizes the state public       utility commission to regulate pole attachments. To date, 24 states       (including the District of Columbia) have certified state-level       regulatory jurisdiction over rates, terms, and conditions for pole       attachments.              https://www.mondaq.com/article/news/1323800?q=1803232&n=810&tp=2&tlk=3&lk=36              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca