Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.editors    |    What? Edlin ain't good enough for you?    |    123,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 123,475 of 123,932    |
|    Janis Papanagnou to Lawrence D'Oliveiro    |
|    Re: Languages to extend editors    |
|    05 Jun 24 10:26:41    |
      From: janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com              On 05.06.2024 01:18, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:       > On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:31:29 -0000 (UTC), Spiros Bousbouras wrote:       >       >> Register a , not buffer A .       >       > Interesting that Emacs also uses the term “register”. Here the term       > actually came from TECO, where they were called “Q-registers” because       they       > were accessed with the “Q” command. There were 26 of them, and each one       > held an integer and a string. Notice that this matches the Emacs concept,       > too.       >       > Does vi/vim also derive its terminology from the same source, I wonder?              Can't tell for [origin of] Vim terminology. But for Vi, as already       said, the official (POSIX) terminology is "buffer" (not "register").       It's likely, though, that Bram has chosen Vim terminology from some       existing source since the official term "buffer" may be confusing.              Janis              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca