From: rowlett@access.net   
      
   On 06/11/2024 12:56 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:   
   > On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:20:16 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:   
   >    
   >> The subject line is   
   >>      "Suitable editor for multiple large complex HTML files"   
   >> Aren't there other uses for "files" than Websites.   
   >    
   > But HTML has provision for embedding arbitrary links to Internet sites.   
   > You may or may not know this; from the sound of it, your audience likely   
   > doesn’t.   
   >    
      
   Those two sentences are outside the relevant universe of discourse.   
   My posts ask for referral to a suitable editor.   
      
   As OP I stated:> Rolling my own allows me to:   
   >    1. learn HTML by doing.   
      
   What downside is there to specifying, for pedagogical reasons, that any    
   file *I* create be compliant with HTML 2 *AND* HTML 4?   
      
   P.S What might be suitable editor for multiple large complex HTML files?   
   [e.g. contents of https://ebible.org/Scriptures/eng-kjv2006_html.zip ;]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)