XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.software.firefox   
   From: this@ddress.is.invalid   
      
   Carlos E.R.  wrote:   
   > On 2025-01-21 05:48, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:   
   > > On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:00:26 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> The IDE has the debugger inside. I launch the IDE, the IDE does the   
   > >> debugging. Not a stand alone debugger.   
   > >   
   > > What difference does it make? Why do you want the debugger to run in the   
   > > same process as the IDE? Do you want it to run in the same process as your   
   > > program? That?s not how debuggers work on modern systems.   
   >   
   > It doesn't matter if it is the same process. It matters that this is   
   > what defines a complete and powerful IDE, having these functionalities   
   > inside, not on an external program (which also exists). This is   
   > technology invented in the 90's or perhaps earlier by Borland.   
      
     Yes, when you described debugging in the IDE, I remembered how it was   
   in Borland's Turbo C.   
      
     Not that I did that much with it. Most of my C programming was on   
   relatively 'dumb' Unix/UNIX environments, but I managed anyway. :-)   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)