XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.comp.software.firefox   
   From: newyana@invalid.nospam   
      
   On 1/21/2025 7:28 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:   
   > On 2025-01-21 05:48, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:   
   >> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:00:26 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> The IDE has the debugger inside. I launch the IDE, the IDE does the   
   >>> debugging. Not a stand alone debugger.   
   >>   
   >> What difference does it make? Why do you want the debugger to run in the   
   >> same process as the IDE? Do you want it to run in the same process as   
   >> your   
   >> program? That’s not how debuggers work on modern systems.   
   >   
   > It doesn't matter if it is the same process. It matters that this is   
   > what defines a complete and powerful IDE, having these functionalities   
   > inside, not on an external program (which also exists). This is   
   > technology invented in the 90's or perhaps earlier by Borland.   
   >   
      Do you realize that this bickering will continue as long as   
   you take part?   
      
      Lawrence reminds me of a couple of people   
   who used to frequent the photo editing newsgroup. They   
   probably still do. One was a know-it-all who would argue that   
   the sky is not blue. The other was a reasonable person but   
   couldn't stop when the bickering started. They'd sometimes   
   go on over 100 posts, with variations on "Is not!" and "Is so!"   
      
       Know-it-alls are highly skilled at twisting details and context   
   in order to assemble unassailable logic:   
      
   "Water is wet."   
   "Is not. Since when you idiot? Have you ever touched an ice cube with   
   cold hands?"   
   "When it's not frozen, it's wet."   
   "Why would you want to get wet?"   
      
      There's an obsession with winning and a notable lack of   
   interest in facts or relevance; an obscene paucity of curiosity.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)