Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.editors    |    What? Edlin ain't good enough for you?    |    123,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 123,748 of 123,932    |
|    Paul to Lawrence D'Oliveiro    |
|    Re: External media file systems (was Re:    |
|    07 Feb 25 00:44:06    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-10       From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Thu, 2/6/2025 5:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:       > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:20:21 -0500, Paul wrote:       >       >> On Thu, 2/6/2025 4:00 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:       >>       >>> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 22:48:55 -0500, Paul wrote:       >>>       >>>> I'm editing a text file from an EXT4 partition, using nothing but       >>>> Microsoft-provided tools.       >>>       >>> And a whole Linux kernel. And you did mention bash, which is part of       >>> the GNU app suite, is it not? So it seems like your Windows userland       >>> has no direct access to that Linux kernel.       >>>       >> But I nevertheless, have access to EXT4, using nothing but       >> Microsoft-provided software.       >       > You mean you consider that Linux kernel and GNU app suite to be       > “Microsoft-provided”? Even though Microsoft had little or nothing to do       > with the development of that software?       >              $ sudo disktype /dev/sda              --- /dev/sda       Block device, size 388.4 MiB (407298048 bytes)       Ext4 file system        UUID nil        Volume size 388.4 MiB (407298048 bytes, 99438 blocks of 4 KiB)              $ sudo disktype /dev/sdb              --- /dev/sdb       Block device, size 16.00 GiB (17179873280 bytes)       Linux swap, version 2, subversion 1, 4 KiB pages, little-endian        Swap size 16.00 GiB (17179865088 bytes, 4194303 pages of 4 KiB)              $ sudo disktype /dev/sdc              --- /dev/sdc       Block device, size 1 TiB (1099511627776 bytes)       Ext4 file system        UUID F722DDB4-B8E6-4D0A-A5BE-4EC49B24314C (DCE, v4)        Last mounted at "/distro"        Volume size 1 TiB (1099511627776 bytes, 268435456 blocks of 4 KiB)              It's a containerized environment, which lacks substantial details.       Most of what you see in /dev is fake. And the above declarations,       have nothing to do with my three NTFS partitions seen in Bash shell.              C:\134 /mnt/c 9p rw,dirsync,noatime,aname=drvfs;path=C:\;uid=100       gid=1000;symlinkroot=/mnt/,mmap,access=client,msize=65536,trans       fd,rfd=6,wfd=6 0 0       H:\134 /mnt/h 9p rw,dirsync,noatime,aname=drvfs;path=H:\;uid=100       gid=1000;symlinkroot=/mnt/,mmap,access=client,msize=65536,trans       fd,rfd=6,wfd=6 0 0       S:\134 /mnt/s 9p rw,dirsync,noatime,aname=drvfs;path=S:\;uid=100       gid=1000;symlinkroot=/mnt/,mmap,access=client,msize=65536,trans       fd,rfd=6,wfd=6 0 0              No, it's not out-of-the-box Linux. Neither is the graphics       stack exactly as seen on any other Linux. The graphics stack       does not seem to be accelerated, as near as I can determine.              You'll notice that GLXGears is not locked to VSync, and I       don't need to give a directive to unlock it from the screen.       Again, graphics are virtualized and composited somehow. and       one thing I notice, is there is no flashing as was seen in       other OSes via Terminal Services (WinXP Mode on Win7 used to       flash a bit).              $ glxgears       623 frames in 5.0 seconds = 124.494 FPS       558 frames in 5.0 seconds = 111.500 FPS       555 frames in 5.0 seconds = 110.852 FPS       559 frames in 5.0 seconds = 111.648 FPS              A significant effort has put into that, and this is not       the usual level of incompetence. Pros did this.              They're willing to spend the money to get the right people.       Too bad the Windows side wasn't that good (I search for       evidence of intelligent life, but have few examples       to build on). Much of what is done on the Windows side,       is to meet some hidden agenda, and it takes me forever       and a day to spot the pattern. Such as the pattern that       Microsoft is trying to remove all proprietary drivers       from the system. So everything will be done with the       equivalent of class drivers. And where they can't meet       that objective, they have the manufacturer ( |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca