Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.editors    |    What? Edlin ain't good enough for you?    |    123,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 123,806 of 123,932    |
|    Marion to Peter Flynn    |
|    Re: What is the best free software for c    |
|    04 Mar 25 03:31:03    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, comp.text.pdf, alt.comp.os.windows-10       From: marion@facts.com              On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 21:38:56 +0000, Peter Flynn wrote :                     > Thank you, this is a hugely useful list.'              Thanks. It needs updating but it covers most of what I've needed to do.       The hard part is keeping it to a single line per need, which necessitates       excessive shortening of the descriptions.              I think you're talking about this line item below:       [x] Create PDF new text (Irfanview or Paint.NET plugins + Ghostscript)       Where that's really about ADDING text to an existing PDF document.              Given the confusion inherent in the lousy way I wrote it, I'll change it to       [x] Add text to existing pdf (Irfanview or Paint.NET plugins + Ghostscript)              Moving forward on your point below with LaTeX, I agree with you that we       need a line item for creating PDFs from scratch using a markup language.              > The one tool missing seems to be LaTeX, for creating PDFs, but perhaps       > "create" in this context means "convert from some other typeset format"       > rather than "typeset directly to PDF" (in industry terms, "originate")              Given LaTeX is the de facto standard for creating mathematical and       scientific documents, I agree with you that it belongs as a line item.       [x] Generate complex PDF using markup language (LaTeX via pdfTeX or LuaTeX)              When I researched what else that is no cost which generates PDFs, most were       programming libraries, such as ReportLab, PDFKit, jsPDF & PDFSharp.              Contrasting with those programming libraries (which require programming       code), LaTeX is a markup language and typesetting system. We write the       document's content and structure using LaTeX commands, and LaTeX handles       the visual formatting to PDF.              So I won't include the programming libraries in that new line, for now.       Does that clarify the two lines better for 'creating' & 'generating' PDF?              [x] Add text to existing pdf (Irfanview or Paint.NET plugins + Ghostscript)       [x] Generate complex PDF using markup language (LaTeX via pdfTeX or LuaTeX)              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca