Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.editors    |    What? Edlin ain't good enough for you?    |    123,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 123,808 of 123,932    |
|    Lawrence D'Oliveiro to Marion    |
|    Re: What is the best free software for c    |
|    04 Mar 25 04:41:22    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, comp.text.pdf, alt.comp.os.windows-10       From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 03:52:13 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote:              > At some point in time I swore off programming languages after concluding       > that they all do teh same damn thing, only with different syntax. :)              New ways of viewing the programming problem often lead to major       improvements in programmer productivity.              Remember Brooks’ Law (or one of them): once a code base reaches a certain       size, a skilled programmer that is familiar with it is only able to       contribute about 10 lines of suitably-debugged code per day. And that       applies across a wide range of language abstraction levels, from assembler       all the way up to what he called “metaprogramming” languages, or very-       high-level languages. Consider how little 10 lines of assembler can do,       versus 10 lines of shell script or Python or Lisp code.              So the only way to improve programmer productivity is to move to higher-       and higher-level languages.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca