Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.editors    |    What? Edlin ain't good enough for you?    |    123,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 123,920 of 123,932    |
|    Anthony Howe to Janis Papanagnou    |
|    Re: Vi: is there any way not to yank tex    |
|    17 Feb 26 05:53:07    |
      From: achowe@snert.com              On 2026-02-16 17:28, Janis Papanagnou wrote:       >> Use "_dd and similar to not put the deleted text in a register.       >> See :h "_       >       > Do you know whether that register was existing in classical Vi ?       > (I don't think so but, frankly, I don't recall and I'm curious.)              The "a .. "z and "1 .. "9 buffers are part of historical `ex` and `vi`, see SUS       https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/ buffer definition.              I used to work on Mortice Kern Systems maintaining their DOS `vi` while we were       balloting POSIX.2. The named buffers were part of the historical `vi` and the       MKS independent clone.              As for the OP, deleting / changing always included a yank into the numeric       buffers. That is historical behaviour and documented in SUS.              --       Anthony C Howe       achowe@snert.com BarricadeMX & Milters       http://nanozen.snert.com/ https://github.com/SirWumpus              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca