From: niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid   
      
   On 23/02/2024 01:40, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:   
   > On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:49:08 +0100, Mild Shock wrote:   
   >   
   >> Lawrence D'Oliveiro schrieb:   
   >>   
   >>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:37:52 +0100, Mild Shock wrote:   
         
   >> Guido von Rossum suggest to not always use method chaining:   
   >   
   > Which is not really answering my question, is it?   
      
   In some scenarios it makes sense to allow chaining.   
   For instance when building the answer to a query where the parts to be   
   included depend on circumstances. As in x.a().b().e().g();   
      
   In other scenarios it just makes things confusing for anyone reading the   
   code, including the writer.   
      
   In other words it depends on design judgement, something that disturbs   
   people who prefer a 300 page book of rules.   
      
      John   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)