Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,346 of 33,346    |
|    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= to All    |
|    Re: initiailizer_list and static_assert    |
|    09 May 11 18:47:20    |
      From: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com              Am 10.05.2011 00:47, schrieb Marc:       >       > Daniel Kr=FCgler wrote:       >       >> In gcc 4.7 all member functions of initializer_list are constexpr, which       >> is a valid library extension, reflecting the proposal       >>       >> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3231.html       >       > Nice. Adding std::get might make the constexpr tuples more useful, but       > it sounds harder too.              What should be harder with a constexpr std::get function? There are no       restrictions to user-code - remember that constexpr functions can be called       with non-constant arguments. In this case they are not different to a normal       function call at all.              Greetings from Bremen,              Daniel Krügler                            --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca