home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c++.moderated      Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery      33,346 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 31,346 of 33,346   
   =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= to All   
   Re: initiailizer_list and static_assert   
   09 May 11 18:47:20   
   
   From: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com   
      
   Am 10.05.2011 00:47, schrieb Marc:   
   >   
   > Daniel Kr=FCgler  wrote:   
   >   
   >> In gcc 4.7 all member functions of initializer_list are constexpr, which   
   >> is a valid library extension, reflecting the proposal   
   >>   
   >> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3231.html   
   >   
   > Nice. Adding std::get might make the constexpr tuples more useful, but   
   > it sounds harder too.   
      
   What should be harder with a constexpr std::get function? There are no   
   restrictions to user-code - remember that constexpr functions can be called   
   with non-constant arguments. In this case they are not different to a normal   
   function call at all.   
      
   Greetings from Bremen,   
      
   Daniel Krügler   
      
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca