77d53d5d   
   From: thor@math.tu-berlin.de   
      
   Am 15.06.2011 01:05, schrieb Andrzej Krzemieński:   
   > Hi,   
   > I tried to compile some information about the history of noexcept   
   > proposals and guidelines on how it should be used safely and   
   > efficiently. I used ISO C++ Committee papers and C++ discussion groups   
   > as the sources of information to write this article:   
   > http://akrzemi1.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/using-noexcept/   
      
   Thanks for the article, but I still find that it leaves one point open:   
   If "noexcept" guarantees that std::terminate is called if an exception   
   is thrown regardless of "noexcept", then in how far does it differ from   
   "throw()"? And why does it offer optimization opportunities throw() does   
   not offer?   
      
   So long,   
   	Thomas   
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)