a1a5d93d   
   From: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com   
      
   Am 24.08.2011 03:49, schrieb gast128@hotmail.com:   
   > Hello all,   
   >   
   > I was wondering why the c++ committee didn't decide to stick to the   
   > '_if' convention as used in other STL algorithm, like all/all_if,   
   > any / any_if etc.   
      
   In principle that would have been possible, but the request of   
   any/all/none is already so fundamental, that the absence of an explicit   
   customization point (the predicate) makes a further reduction hard to   
   argue for.   
      
   > These new algorithms seems only be defined for use with predicates.   
   > But what if u just want to use these for testing against a value, you   
   > now have to bind an argument to an equal_to structure. Or perhaps this   
   > can be easier done?   
   >   
   > void f()   
   > {   
   >      std::vector  vec(1, 3);   
   >   
   >      const bool bAny = std::any_of(vec.begin(), vec.end(),   
   > boost::bind(std::equal_to(), _1, 3));   
   >      _ASSERT(bAny);   
   > }   
      
   Just use a lambda expression instead:   
      
   void f()   
   {   
        std::vector vec(1, 3);   
      
        const bool bAny = std::any_of(vec.begin(), vec.end(),   
         [](int value) { return value == 3; });   
        _ASSERT(bAny);   
   }   
      
   HTH & Greetings from Bremen,   
      
   Daniel Krügler   
      
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)