Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,430 of 33,346    |
|    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= to All    |
|    Re: any_of, all_of, none_of    |
|    29 Aug 11 05:32:08    |
      09358158       From: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com              Am 28.08.2011 20:20, schrieb gast128@hotmail.com:       [..]       > Actually I have 2 requests:       > - all / all_if: value and predicate variants. This one I was posting       > about.              If you want to realize I suggest that you make a official proposal and       send it for consideration to the committee.              > - all / all_if working on ranges instead of [begin, end>. This will       > probably offered by Boost.Range in time              This won't work without a complete proposal for ranges in the library.       It wouldn't make sense to provide such a support for a single function       template.              > If the STL doesn't offer a value based one, we can still define one in       > our code, preferably in the implementation using the all_of varaint.       > Since this is a template (look at the function prototype in previous       > post) we cannot use the lambda expressions.              You claimed this several times and I asked for some evidence. Why       shouldn't this work:              #include |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca