From: mordor.nospam@fly.srk.fer.hr   
      
   On 2011-09-15, Carlos Moreno  wrote:   
   >   
   > As usual, with any criticism / complaint about moderators   
   > making some mistake, we incur the risk of sounding ungrateful;   
   >   
   What I fail to see is why replies have been approved, AFTER the   
   moderator(s) have agreed that the original article shouldn't   
   have been approved.  I guess the moderator could have just made   
   his own post saying "OP was erroneously approved, the thread is   
   killed as of now."   
      
   >   
   > But anyway, please rest assured that we (at least some of us;   
   > hopfully *most* of us) are quite grateful for your contribution   
   >   
   Indeed.  While the OP was not on-topic, it was not at least a   
   spam post trying to sell some crap.   
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)