Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,471 of 33,346    |
|    Marc to Marc    |
|    Re: ABI of passing empty classes by valu    |
|    16 Sep 11 19:40:26    |
      From: marc.glisse@gmail.com              Marc wrote:              > In C++, it is fairly common to pass functions an extra argument that       > is used purely for dispatching purposes (or at least type       > information), from a tag class that doesn't have any content.       [...]       > Now in all ABIs I have seen, since sizeof(Tag)==1, an object of size 1       > is copied, put on the stack (or in a register), etc, and nothing takes       > advantage of the fact that it could be implemented as a function with       > 1 fewer argument              I just found out that the "Itanium C++ ABI" (used by a large       proportion of C++ compilers) almost had this optimization thanks to       SGI, but then gcc and HP had some (unspecified) difficulty and it was       removed :-(              http://sourcery.mentor.com/public/cxx-abi/cxx-closed.html       issue A-5.              Obviously an ABI, like any standard, is a compromise that won't       satisfy everyone perfectly...                     --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca