From: musiphil@bawi.org   
      
   On 2011-09-16 19:39, Zeljko Vrba wrote:   
   > On 2011-09-15, Carlos Moreno  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> As usual, with any criticism / complaint about moderators   
   >> making some mistake, we incur the risk of sounding ungrateful;   
   >>   
   > What I fail to see is why replies have been approved, AFTER the   
   > moderator(s) have agreed that the original article shouldn't   
   > have been approved.  I guess the moderator could have just made   
   > his own post saying "OP was erroneously approved, the thread is   
   > killed as of now."   
      
   That could also have worked. However, we tend to be more lenient   
   toward follow-ups, even if the OP was accepted by mistake. Especially   
   if the discussion is not diverging further off topic, but if the   
   follow-ups seem to wrap it up or steer it back on topic. Threads are   
   killed only very exceptionally, i.e. if they "get out of control."   
      
   --   
   Seungbeom Kim   
      
      
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)