From: dave@boostpro.com   
      
   on Sun Oct 02 2011, nmm1-AT-cam.ac.uk wrote:   
      
   > The STL isn't very high quality, anyway, which is another problem :-(   
      
   By what measure?   
      
   It has its shorcomings, but along many axes, I'd say it is of very high   
   quality... a level of quality that easily surpasses that of any library   
   with similar intentions when the STL was introduced.   
      
   --   
   Dave Abrahams   
   BoostPro Computing   
   http://www.boostpro.com   
      
      
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)