Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,542 of 33,346    |
|    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= to Mathias Gaunard    |
|    Re: std::vector for incomplete type    |
|    05 Oct 11 03:25:27    |
      a91c4325       From: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com              On 2011-10-05 00:41, Mathias Gaunard wrote:       > On Oct 4, 8:44 pm, "Martin B."<0xCDCDC...@gmx.at> wrote:       >       >> Hmmm ... haven't some issues wrt. to forward declaring stuff       >> (templates?) been addresses in C++11?       >       > The default template parameters would be a problem to forward declare       > std::vector.              This wouldn't be the actual problem, I think. You could omit the default       template argument without a problem, which is typically sufficient for       most use-cases.              > I've never really understood why redefining default template       > parameters after a forward-declaration is ill-formed.              This is due to fact, because that follows the same rules like default       arguments of functions:              void foo(int = 42);       void foo(int = 42); // Ill-formed              HTH & Greetings from Bremen,              Daniel Krügler                     --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca