From: dave@boostpro.com   
      
   on Wed Oct 05 2011, nmm1-AT-cam.ac.uk wrote:   
      
   > I am going to look at boost::multi_array fairly carefully, but I   
   > believe that a C++ class could be as efficient as modern Fortran   
   > array handling.  For example, there is nothing stopping a class   
   > having multiple iterator methods, which would provide the strength   
   > reduction optimisation that is easy in Fortran but trickier in C++.   
   > Yes, I mean strided iterators along any dimension, but it would   
   > also be possible to support diagonals and iterators that deliver   
   > sections.  Let's see how well boost::multi_array measures up :-)   
      
   I don't think you'll find what you're looking for in multi_array.  That   
   kind of work has been done in other (non-boost) libraries, and possibly   
   in boost::uBlas (of which I am unable to keep track).   
      
   --   
   Dave Abrahams   
   BoostPro Computing   
   http://www.boostpro.com   
      
      
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)