Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,552 of 33,346    |
|    Seungbeom Kim to Harry    |
|    Re: Best practice to handle segmentation    |
|    07 Oct 11 06:31:13    |
      d5397751       From: musiphil@bawi.org              On 2011-10-06 11:34, Harry wrote:       > Hi Gurus,       > Is it a best practice to handle segmentation fault inside a shared       > library(.so) C++ ?       > The shared library is used by C/C++ and java applications.       > My intention is that the program using my shared library should get       > return values in all cases even in case of segmentation faults.              Technically OT :), but I've seen programs that fork and let the child       process run a subtask that might crash. In that way, the parent process       can detect the crash and convert it into an error code or an exception       when the child crashes.              --       Seungbeom Kim                      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca