From: musiphil@bawi.org   
      
   On 2011-11-01 12:33, Carlo Milanesi wrote:   
   > On 01/11/2011 11.58, topoden wrote:   
   >> Given we now have ranged for loops... Why do we still need   
   >> std::for_each + lambda? Doesn't ranged for loop do exactly the same   
   >> now?   
   >   
   > I would say: "Given we now have lambdas ... Why do we still need   
   > ranged-for loops?"   
      
   For one thing, for loops can have jump statements (such as "break", "goto",   
   or "return") leading out of them, for which lambdas have no equivalent.   
      
   --   
   Seungbeom Kim   
      
      
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)