From: moreno_news@mailinator.com   
      
   On 11-11-11 08:29 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:   
      
   >> Anyway, we're hopefully clear and in sync about what we all mean   
   >> when discussing the issue!  Hopefully the thread will be about to   
   >> close, and not about to turn into a philosophical discussion  :-)   
   >   
   > Sorry to disappoint, but I honestly think your focus is in the wrong   
   > place.  You posted in search of enough understanding about this UB to   
   > explain the case to your colleagues.  It can be a subtle thing to   
   > understand, so I'm trying to clarify.  Call that nitpicking if you like,   
   > but I'm trying to help.   
      
   Of course --- and like with pretty much all of the replies that I got,   
   I do appreciate it!   
      
   I guess my reaction was because you were clarifying/emphasizing   
   something that was very clear in my mind.  (and I had explained   
   that aspect to my colleague, who at that point rather wanted some   
   *official* legislation on the issue).   
      
   Cheers,   
      
   Carlos   
   --   
      
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)