Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,729 of 33,346    |
|    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= to pjacobi    |
|    Re: Private member functions cannot be g    |
|    09 Dec 11 09:25:40    |
      273aefe0       From: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com              On 2011-12-09 06:05, pjacobi wrote:       > It seems GCC and MSVC agree on this:       >       > When f is is a private member of class Foo, then class class Bar       > cannot declare Foo::f to be a function friend.       >       > Isn't this a bit strange? That function declaration would not give Bar       > access to Foo internals, just the other way around, as any friend       > declaration does.              I agree that the current rules are unfortunate in this regard.              > So, is it really forbidden by the standard?              It seems so. As of 11.3 p9:              "A name nominated by a friend declaration shall be accessible in the       scope of the class containing the friend declaration."              HTH & Greetings from Bremen,              Daniel Krügler                     --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca