Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,815 of 33,346    |
|    Dave Abrahams to All    |
|    Re: Just making sure about an assumption    |
|    18 Jan 12 12:14:08    |
   
   From: dave@boostpro.com   
      
   on Tue Jan 17 2012, Frank Birbacher wrote:   
      
   > Hi!   
   >   
   > Am 16.01.12 00:05, schrieb Dave Abrahams:   
   >> That looks right to me. I think you could also write   
   >>   
   >> noexcept(noexcept(T{T()}))   
   >   
   > Would noexcept(noexcept( [](){ return T(); } )) be equally valid?   
      
   Nope; you still need to invoke that lambda to get a T out of it ;-)   
      
   --   
   Dave Abrahams   
   BoostPro Computing   
   http://www.boostpro.com   
      
      
    [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
    [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca