home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c++.moderated      Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery      33,346 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 31,815 of 33,346   
   Dave Abrahams to All   
   Re: Just making sure about an assumption   
   18 Jan 12 12:14:08   
   
   From: dave@boostpro.com   
      
   on Tue Jan 17 2012, Frank Birbacher  wrote:   
      
   > Hi!   
   >   
   > Am 16.01.12 00:05, schrieb Dave Abrahams:   
   >> That looks right to me.  I think you could also write   
   >>   
   >>   noexcept(noexcept(T{T()}))   
   >   
   > Would noexcept(noexcept( [](){ return T(); } )) be equally valid?   
      
   Nope; you still need to invoke that lambda to get a T out of it ;-)   
      
   --   
   Dave Abrahams   
   BoostPro Computing   
   http://www.boostpro.com   
      
      
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca