home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c++.moderated      Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery      33,346 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 31,851 of 33,346   
   =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= to All   
   Re: Why is static member initialization    
   26 Jan 12 11:47:02   
   
   04b62847   
   From: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com   
      
   Am 26.01.2012 00:04, schrieb Nikolay Ivchenkov:   
   [..]   
   > I have other suggestion: members, that should be automatically   
   > instantiated when their enclosing class is instantiated, could be   
   > declared with a special attribute:   
   >   
   >     template   
   >         struct X   
   >     {   
   >        [[instantiated]] static A m;   
   >     };   
   >   
   >     template   
   >         A X::m;   
   >   
   > Another suggestion is to allow in-class definitions of statc data   
   > members:   
   >   
   >     // has the same effect as the code above   
   >     template   
   >         struct X   
   >     {   
   >        [[instantiated]] inline static A m; // definition   
   >     };   
   >   
   > Do you like these suggestions?   
      
   Yes, I think it would be of great help to have some explicit means to   
   enforce instantiation, function evaluation, or object construction.   
      
   Greetings from Bremen,   
      
   Daniel Krügler   
      
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca