Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,942 of 33,346    |
|    Andre Kaufmann to All    |
|    Re: Are MACROS good and can the compiler    |
|    16 Feb 12 21:15:35    |
      0054b3ee       From: akfmnews@t-online.de              >> - Macros prevent the compiler to be as fast in compilation as compilers       >> of       >> [...]              >Easy fix: don't do it again and again, just do it once.              I don't do it, the compiler does.       If I touch a header file, which is included in every cpp file of a project,       the compiler       simply recompiles the whole project, even if it wouldn't have to.       In other languages only a single module is recompiled not the whole project.              >Again, you can see it just fine. All compilers have a switch you can       >use to just preprocess the files, and all IDEs have it very well       >integrated.                     >> Macros have the advantage to be built into the "language" (preprocessor).       >> But IMHO this doesn't outweigh       >> the disadvantages.              >It does for me.              It does for me too, but it could be better.       macros differently. It's not a huge problem,       C++ has many advantages and if macros are not misused       they do for me too.              Andre                     --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca