7aa3d79b   
   From: 0xCDCDCDCD@gmx.at   
      
   On 15.02.2012 22:25, Mathias Gaunard wrote:   
   > On Feb 15, 2:19 am, "Martin B."<0xCDCDC...@gmx.at>  wrote:   
   >   
   >> I beg to differ. There's nothing scary about std::vector and nobody is   
   required to gulp down *the whole* of the standard lkibrary in one go.   
   >   
   > The standard library is very small compared to other programming   
   > languages, or even most framework libraries. There are plans to vastly   
   > increase its size.   
   >   
   > How could it ever be called huge and difficult to gulp?   
   >   
      
   I would like to clarify that *I* neither said "huge" nor "difficult" :-)   
      
   I said "nobody is required to gulp down *the whole* (...) in one go",   
   and indeed it wouldn't make much sense IMHO, taking [the   
   whole](http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp) in one go.   
      
   cheers,   
   Martin   
      
   --   
   Good C++ code is better than good C code, but   
   bad C++ can be much, much worse than bad C code.   
      
      
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)