Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 31,999 of 33,346    |
|    Christopher Creutzig to Roman W    |
|    Re: Why not add a feature to let lambda     |
|    10 Mar 12 11:22:22    |
      ac60c715       From: christopher@creutzig.de              On 3/9/12 1:46 AM, Roman W wrote:              > Since a lambda is always a function object, couldn't you call it as       >       > (*this)(arg1, arg2, ...);              No, see §5.1.2.7:              | […] for purposes of […] determining the type and value of this       | (9.3.2) […], the compound-statement is considered in the context of       | the lambda-expression.                     Christopher                     --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca