ddfee5e0   
   From: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com   
      
   Am 15.03.2012 22:54, schrieb Daryle Walker:   
   > The reason is that I wanted built-in integer   
   > members to be zero, which means value-initialization, while defaulting   
   > a default constructor does default-initialization (duh).   
      
   In this case you can combine the advantages of defaulting with that of   
   data-member initializers. Consider:   
      
   struct C {   
     int i{};   
     C() noexcept = default;   
   };   
      
   which performs value-initialization of the int member irrespective of   
   the form of the initialization.   
      
   > * Value-initialization   
   > -- Default-initialization for class types   
      
   We have a bit more here: For class types without user-provided or   
   deleted default-constructor, the object becomes additionally   
   zero-initialized.   
      
   > -- Zero-initialization for built-in integer and pointer types   
   > -- (I'm not sure what happens for enumeration types.)   
      
   Enumeration types are also zero-initialized.   
      
   HTH & Greetings from Bremen,   
      
   Daniel Krügler   
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)