ba9807fd   
   From: mordor.nospam@fly.srk.fer.hr   
      
   On 2012-03-15, Michael  wrote:   
   >   
   > This omission has become a pet peeve of mine lately...   
   >   
   So you want even more implicitness in C++?!  I think you should switch   
   to Scala ;)   
      
   But seriously, == might be defined, for example, to test for equivalence;   
   automatically defining x != y as !(x==y) might not be correct in that case.   
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)