Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,021 of 33,346    |
|    Jens Schmidt to Marc    |
|    Re: why not implicit operator !=()?    |
|    16 Mar 12 11:30:47    |
      From: Jens.Schmidt-HH@gmx.de              Marc wrote:              > I have often seen operator== return something that is not bool, but I       > can't remember ever seing operator!= do something significantly       > different from !operator==.              What about floating point? Comparisons with NaN result in neither       equal nor unequal, but unordered.       --       Greetings,        Jens Schmidt                      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca