home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c++.moderated      Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery      33,346 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 32,021 of 33,346   
   Jens Schmidt to Marc   
   Re: why not implicit operator !=()?   
   16 Mar 12 11:30:47   
   
   From: Jens.Schmidt-HH@gmx.de   
      
   Marc wrote:   
      
   > I have often seen operator== return something that is not bool, but I   
   > can't remember ever seing operator!= do something significantly   
   > different from !operator==.   
      
   What about floating point? Comparisons with NaN result in neither   
   equal nor unequal, but unordered.   
   --   
   Greetings,   
      Jens Schmidt   
      
      
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca